Texans Get Screwed Over By Electricity Retailers In Heatwave
Last week Texas suffered through a stinking hot heatwave.
And just like the polar vortex five months ago, we saw an excellent example of villainous electricity retailer behaviour we must never allow in Australia.
In January when Texans were freezing to death, some people were signed up to electricity plans without realising they were committing to paying wholesale electricity prices. In the middle of a blizzard, these rose to over AUD $11 per kilowatt-hour. Some households received electricity bills for thousands of US dollars in one month. I wrote about this mess here.
We have electricity plans that expose households to wholesale prices in Australia, but they come with a safety feature protecting homes from unexpectedly huge power bills. The Texan plans didn’t have any such safety measure.
The retailers’ behaviour in the heatwave isn’t as bad. No one’s being put in a dangerous situation or receiving ridiculously high electricity bills. Instead, the problem is people are having their air conditioner thermostat increased remotely during a heatwave. The news reports exaggerate the discomfort that resulted.
[embedded content]
In the video, Texans complain the temperature inside reached 78 degrees. This sounds horrific, but in the primitive English dialect Americans use, 78 degrees actually means 26 degrees.
It would be easy for me to make fun of Texans complaining about the temperature reaching 26°C when it has gone over 46°C here in Adelaide1, so I will:
On the other hand, Texans probably think we’re complete idiots because of our habit of always forgetting the Alamo.
The problem is not that air conditioners are adjusted remotely. It’s a useful way of reducing strain on the grid and helping lower electricity costs. The system even seems pretty intelligent as it can pre-cool the home before the thermostat is turned up. The problems are:
- Not all who signed up knew what they were getting into. Some say they unenrolled but were still affected.
- The electricity retailers and the company making the remote adjustment are financially benefiting while the households with their electricity use reduced get bugger all.
Big Savings For Electricity Retailers
It’s now common for new air conditioners sold in the United States to come with remote thermostat adjustment. They have installed over 40 million of them. The idea — which isn’t a terrible one — is grid operators can reduce air conditioner electricity consumption when the grid is under stress. Cranking up air conditioner temperatures remotely in the middle of a heatwave isn’t something people appreciate, but it has the potential to save households a lot of money. Unfortunately Texan households are getting almost nothing in return.
The main company involved in remotely controlling Texans’ air conditioner thermostats in the US is called Energyhub. If you join their program you permit them to increase your air conditioner thermostat by 2.2°C remotely. That’s 4 degrees Fahrenheit in crazy 18th century style American units.2 That’s not a lot and no one is likely to die from heatstroke as a result. Still, it is enough to stop electricity consumption by an air conditioner for a period of time and — in most circumstances — reduce the energy consumed when it turns back on. The amount of time this adjustment lasts is normally 1-4 hours, but can be longer if the situation is regarded as an emergency.
Americans have large homes. Well, not all Americans, but the ones we see on TV do.
How much energy will be saved by remotely cranking an air conditioner’s thermostat up by 2.2 degrees will depend on the external temperature, the thermostat’s original setting, the size and efficiency of the air conditioner, and the home’s thermal envelope.
Because the average Texan home uses around 13,350 kilowatt-hours a year — more than twice the Australian average — my guess is their average air conditioner is pretty large. A typical remote thermostat adjustment may reduce electricity consumption by over 2 kilowatt-hours. Normally, 2 kilowatt-hours would cost a Texas household around 34 Australian cents. But during a period of high demand, the cost of wholesale electricity to a retailer can go over $11 Australian per kilowatt-hour. So, one adjustment might save the electricity retailer more than $22 in wholesale electricity costs while saving the household only 34 cents.
The US Energyhub company says:
“We estimate there will be two to eight adjustment events from June 1st through September 30, 2021.”
But they also say there could be more than 8 adjustments in an emergency. I don’t know what they consider an emergency, but I’m guessing their recent heatwave counts as one.
If we assume there are 5 adjustments and each saves the retailer an average of $20, then from June to September remote adjustment would save the retailer $100 in wholesale electricity costs.
If the system was in any way fair, you might expect the household would have their power bill reduced by close to this amount. But that’s not what happens.
US Energyhub “Lose Control Of Your Air Conditioner” Sweepstakes
Texas households don’t get money in return for relinquishing control over their thermostats. Instead, they get a tiny chance to win money in the…
“ENERGYHUB: WIN $5,000 PROMOTION”
I know this sounds like a joke, but here’s a page with the details. If you were a literal-minded person, you might think a “WIN $5,000 PROMOTION” would have a prize of $5,000 US but it’s not the way it works in the United States, which is the land of car autopilots that require you to pay attention to the road at all times.
Instead of receiving $5,000, the prize is to have one year of electricity bills paid up to a maximum of $5,000. At the moment the average Texas residential electricity bill is around $1,700 US.
Only One Winner
There will only be one winner in the whole of Texas for the year. If we assume 5,000 households take part then giving up control of your air conditioner, after adjusting for your chance of winning, will have an expected average return of $1. If your electricity consumption is average it will only be 34 cents.
There are 29 million people in Texas, so for all I know, the number could be over one million. If there are 100,000 entrants, the expected return for an average household would be 1.7 cents. If there are a million, it would be 0.17 cents.
It’s A Con Job
You might be wondering why anyone would give up control of their air conditioner to a third party for a return that may average under two cents. I’m pretty sure the answer is most didn’t. My guess is most thought they were taking part in a simple contest without any real downside. Not many Australians relinquish control of their air conditioner in return for a ticket to a really shitty lottery, and I’d expect the average Texan to be even more resistant.
But no matter what Texans thought they were getting into, to me it seems blatantly unfair households get next to nothing when they’re the ones making the (mild) sacrifice, and the companies involved are the ones reaping all the financial benefit. Maybe some or most of the cost savings will be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices in the future, but I have some doubts that will happen. Even assuming it does, those who have their thermostats adjusted won’t receive any more reward than others.
Not Suitable For Australia
Remote control of air conditioners already occurs in Australia, mostly in large commercial and industrial buildings, as part of our Wholesale Demand Response Mechanism. But remote adjustment or demand management of residential air conditioners is coming with several trials underway or complete.
I don’t know enough about what’s planned in Australia to judge whether or not it will be fair, but obviously, we don’t want a Texas-style situation where people are conned out of control of their air conditioners in return for entry into some two-bit, two-cent, contest. I expect something better than that for Australians.
Footnotes
Original Source: https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/texas-electricity-heatwave/